Comments on: Benchmarking hashes for FG-fed Linux http://bvt-trace.net/2019/11/benchmarking-hashes-for-fg-fed-linux/ Fri, 21 Aug 2020 17:09:16 +0000 http://polimedia.us hourly 1 By: Mircea Popescu http://bvt-trace.net/2019/11/benchmarking-hashes-for-fg-fed-linux/#comment-98 Mircea Popescu Fri, 06 Dec 2019 01:15:32 +0000 http://bvt-trace.net/?p=55#comment-98 > The results stayed the same (0%) when inner ring was full and FG data was being processed with good hash function Fucking beautiful. > The results are: Seems we're talking of a factor of about 4 - 5 (keccak vs sha ; serpent vs chacha). Imo quite acceptabru, esp considering what we're getting in trade. > The results stayed the same (0%) when inner ring was full and FG data was being processed with good hash function

Fucking beautiful.

> The results are:

Seems we're talking of a factor of about 4 - 5 (keccak vs sha ; serpent vs chacha). Imo quite acceptabru, esp considering what we're getting in trade.

]]> By: bvt http://bvt-trace.net/2019/11/benchmarking-hashes-for-fg-fed-linux/#comment-86 bvt Fri, 15 Nov 2019 22:12:59 +0000 http://bvt-trace.net/?p=55#comment-86 If 24 MB/s is enough for Eulora I would be happy to cement Keccak in. Also, for Serpent there are several SSE implementations, which potentially should have even higher throughput. If 24 MB/s is enough for Eulora I would be happy to cement Keccak in.

Also, for Serpent there are several SSE implementations, which potentially should have even higher throughput.

]]> By: Diana Coman http://bvt-trace.net/2019/11/benchmarking-hashes-for-fg-fed-linux/#comment-85 Diana Coman Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:56:05 +0000 http://bvt-trace.net/?p=55#comment-85 This looks really good to me and to have 24MB/s with Keccak or 77mB/s with Serpent is not bad at all. This looks really good to me and to have 24MB/s with Keccak or 77mB/s with Serpent is not bad at all.

]]>